20. Pre-med/Spanish Student. Learning, living.Thanks for stopping by.


8 of 284
posted 1 year ago with 2,537 notes , via , source - reblog

I dig it.

posted 1 year ago with 0 notes - reblog

bestrafemich21:

adrians:

German guy confused by the meaning of “Party Pooper”.

THIS IS THE GREATEST THING I HAVE SEEN ON THIS WEBSITE EVER.

anotherdamnposer:

Being an atheist is ok.
Being an atheist and shaming religion and spirituality as silly or not real is not ok.

Being a Christian is ok.
Being a homophobic, misogynistic, racist, or otherwise hateful person in the name of Christianity is not ok.

Being a reindeer is ok.
Bullying and excluding another reindeer because he has a shiny red nose is not ok.
posted 1 year ago with 276,247 notes , via - reblog

mymoonxmyman:


Poster advertising ‘Chocolat Idéal’ by Alphonse Mucha, 1897.

posted 1 year ago with 569 notes , via , source - reblog

ihititwithmyaxe:

mothernaturenetwork:

Harry Potter wizarding genetics decoded

If the wizarding gene is dominant, as J.K. Rowling says in her famous series of Harry Potter books, then how can a wizard be born to muggle parents (non-magical people)? And how can there be squibs (non-magical people born into wizarding lines)?

It seems these baffling genetic questions have finally been answered, thanks to Andrea Klenotiz, a biology student at the University of Delaware.

In a six-page paper, which she sent to Rowling, Klenotiz outlines how the wizarding gene works and even explains why some witches and wizards are more powerful than others.

“Magical ability could be explained by a single autosomal dominant gene if it is caused by an expansion of trinucleotide repeats with non-Mendelian ratios of inheritance,” Klenotiz explains.

What does this mean?

In school we learn the fundamentals of genetics by studying Gregory Mendel’s pea plant experiments and completing basic Punnett squares. Basically, we’re taught that whenever one copy of a gene linked to a dominant trait is present, then the offspring will exhibit that dominant trait, regardless of the other gene.

However, Non-Mendelian genes don’t follow this rule, which is the basis of Klenotiz’s argument. She says that the wizarding gene could be explained if it’s caused by a trinucleotide repeat, which is the repetition of three nucleotides — the building blocks of DNA — multiple times.

These repeats can be found in normal genes, but sometimes many more copies of this repeated code can appear in genes than is standard, causing a mutation. This kind of mutation is responsible for genetic diseases like Huntington’s Disease. Depending upon how many of these repeats occur in the genes, a person could exhibit no symptoms, could have a mild form of the disease or could have a severe form of it.

In her paper, Klenotiz argues that eggs with high levels of these repeats are more likely to be fertilized, a phenomenon known as transmission ratio distortion. She also suggests that the egg or sperm with high levels of repeats is less likely to be created or to survive in the wizarding womb.

This argument answers several questions about wizarding genetics:

How can a wizard be born to muggle parents?

Genetic mutations can randomly appear, meaning anyone could be born with the wizarding gene. However, there’s a better chance of magical offspring occurring if the parents are on the high side of the normal range for mutations.

How can a squib be born to wizard parents?

Although parents with these mutated magical genes would be likely to pass the gene on to their children, there’s still a possibility that any given offspring might not inherit the trinucleotide repeat.

How can varying degrees of magical ability be explained?

The more repeats a wizard inherits, the stronger the magical power he or she will have. If both wizarding parents are powerful wizards, it’s likely their offspring will also be powerful.

You can read Klenotiz’s full paper on wizarding genetics here.

Far and away one of the nerdiest things I’ve ever read. Love it.

my mind is telling me no

and my budget

my budget is also telling me no

posted 1 year ago with 345,801 notes , via , source - reblog
posted 1 year ago with 136,892 notes , via - reblog
#I dig it

I am obsessed with this blog.

posted 1 year ago with 517 notes , via - reblog
posted 1 year ago with 547 notes , via - reblog

We all fall apart
but no one puts themselves back
together like me. —
Daily Haiku on Love by Tyler Knott Gregson

(via tylerknott)

posted 1 year ago with 1,272 notes , via - reblog
posted 1 year ago with 4,655 notes , via , source - reblog

cwnerd12:

thecityofpawnee:

????

I know he’s been to rehab and all but damn.  This is a shock.  Everyone’s been expecting Amanda or Lindsay to die but then death sucker punches us all and takes someone we totally weren’t expecting.

Flashback to Heath Ledger dying when we all expected Amy Winehouse to die.

Of course, we all know what eventually happened to Amy but damn.

posted 1 year ago with 26 notes , via , source - reblog
#I am so sad
Credit